Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031485›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Development and validation of the self-care in partners of cancer patients (SC-PC) questionnaire: a mixed methods study protocol.

Katarina von Dungen, Peter Herschbach, Harald Gündel, Klaus Hönig

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarina von DungenDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany katarina.von-dungen@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-552X
Peter HerschbachComprehensive Cancer Center, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9404-253X
Harald GündelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-320X
Klaus HönigDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6813-1814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPartners of cancer patients often show similar levels of distress like the oncological patients themselves, and they are a primary resource for the patient's physical and emotional support. Integrating self-care in daily routines is applied as a treatment approach in cognitive behavioural therapy. Carrying out self-care in caring relatives prevents anxiety and depression, enhances health-related quality of life and reduces caregiver burden. So far, there is no instrument which assesses self-care specifically in partners of cancer patients. The aim of this prospective mixed-methods validation study is to develop and psychometrically evaluate a psychological self-reported questionnaire assessing self-care in partners of cancer patients (SC-PC questionnaire). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Recruitment of participants will take place online and offline across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The data collection will be carried out via personal cognitive qualitative interviews and a web-based data assessment tool within four phases: (1) personal qualitative semi-structured interviews with n≈15 partners of cancer patients on self-care in different areas of life; (2) pretest of derived self-care items concerning feasibility, comprehensibility and completeness with n=3-5 (psycho-)oncological experts and n=20-30 partners of cancer patients; (3) pilot study with an exploratory factor analysis with n=300 partners of cancer patients, based on an expected initial item pool of approximately 30 items and a 10:1 item-participant ratio; and (4) main validation study with confirmatory factor analysis with n=400 partners of cancer patients, based on an expected final item pool of approximately 20 items and a 20:1 item-participant ratio. Subgroup analyses will be calculated with demographic and medical variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A project-specific concept for data protection was established. All legal and professional regulations will be complied with. In order to meet ethical standards and protect participants from potential emotional burdens during this mainly decentralised study, ethical guidelines for online studies were implemented in the study design. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Ulm (number/ID of the approval: 230/25). Results will be presented at conferences and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals for broad reach. The resulting self-care questionnaire may be implemented as a new measurement instrument in research projects investigating psycho-oncological interventions for partners of cancer patients and the practical field of cancer counselling for progress assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00038519.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsSelf CareSpousesAdultAustriaFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAdult oncologyMENTAL HEALTHPsychometricsSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42031485
PMCPMC13110578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.