ArticleBMJ open2026
Towards an integrated model for dengue management: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of recombinase polymerase amplification-based assays for mosquito-borne virus detection in clinical samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in mosquito gut microbiota: Mechanisms of regulating pathogen transmission and applications in vector control.Virulence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically identify and synthesise dengue management strategies, levels of implementation, management dimensions, key challenges and proposed solutions across health systems worldwide.
designA scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2003 and December 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English-language, peer-reviewed articles and reviews focusing on dengue management strategies, challenges and solutions at any health system level were included. Studies without full-text access or outside the scope of dengue management were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a structured form. Extracted data were charted and synthesised using an inductive thematic approach to identify core strategy domains, implementation levels, challenges and solutions.
resultsOf 4822 records identified, 34 studies met the eligibility criteria. Dengue management strategies were categorised into six domains: vector and environmental control; surveillance and early warning systems; vaccination; enhancement of diagnostic and treatment services; community participation and education; and governance with intersectoral coordination. Implementation occurred at community, municipal, national, regional and international levels. Key challenges were grouped into five domains: structural and resource-related; sociocultural; governance and policy; scientific and technological; and climate- and urbanisation-related factors.
conclusionsGlobal dengue management is increasingly adopting integrated, multi-sectoral approaches. Effective dengue control requires strengthening health system infrastructure, institutionalising community engagement and leveraging scientific and technological innovations. Sustained political commitment, stable financing mechanisms and coordinated governance across sectors are essential for resilient and sustainable dengue control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.