ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2026
Evaluation of Chimerism Testing by Next-Generation Sequencing Using Insertion/Deletion Markers: Analytical Validation and Examples of Clinical Utilization.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical variability in chimerism testing may influence longitudinal clinical interpretation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-transplant engraftment monitoring is essential to assess the risk of complications after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation, such as graft failure and disease relapse. It is based on the analysis of the percentage of chimerism detected in the recipient. Chimerism analysis has been routinely performed using short tandem repeats (STRs). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made possible the use of other genetic markers, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions (indels). This study evaluated the performance characteristics of the NGStrack assay from GenDx to verify its accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility. It was determined that the assay can detect DNA contributed by donor and recipient within the range of 0.5% to 99.5%. The results of this assay were compared with an STR-based method, and examples of clinical utilization of the assay were provided using patient cases, including chimerism analysis on different cell subsets. It was confirmed that chimerism analysis using indel markers provides an increased sensitivity with respect to the reported sensitivity of assays using STR. The sensitivity for STR-based methods is in the range of 1% to 5%, whereas the sensitivity for the indel NGS-based method assessed here is 0.5%. The increased sensitivity and precise correlation between chimerism results with clinical events validates the usefulness of this assay for early diagnosis of disease relapse and graft failure and allows for more precise clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.