Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031230›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026

A cognitive dissonance-based intervention to reduce ultra-processed food intake: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Charlotte Hagerman, Danny Choo-Kang, Erica LaFata, Paul Rohde, Meghan Butryn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07226336 (Testing a Dissonance-Based Intervention to Reduce Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Via Activism Against the Food Industry), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07226336 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this map

Testing a Dissonance-Based Intervention to Reduce Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Via Activism Against the Food Industry

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Research InstituteRan2026 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsUltra-Processed Food Intake, Obesity & OverweightArmsIntroductory Educational Workshop, Standard Dietary Change (ON/OFF), Cognitive Dissonance Strategies (ON/OFF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte HagermanOregon Research Institute, 3800 Sports Way, Springfield, OR 97477, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: chagerman@ori.org.
Danny Choo-KangOregon Research Institute, 3800 Sports Way, Springfield, OR 97477, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: dc3526@alum.barnard.edu.
Erica LaFataOregon Research Institute, 3800 Sports Way, Springfield, OR 97477, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: elafata@ori.org.
Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute, 3800 Sports Way, Springfield, OR 97477, USA. Electronic address: paulr@ori.org.
Meghan ButrynDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: mlb34@drexel.edu.

Funding

New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research - Translational Intervention Methodology CoreP30DK111022 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI JEFFREY GONZALEZ · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite their harmful mental and physical health effects, ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are highly prevalent in the US. To maximize profits, the UPF industry designs these foods to be hyperpalatable, markets them aggressively, and influences government policies to prevent their regulation. To combat this powerful influence, individuals must be highly motivated to reduce their UPF intake. If participants learn about the harms of the UPF industry and publicly denounce the industry, they are expected to experience strong cognitive dissonance and motivation to reduce their intake of these foods.

methodsThrough a 2 × 2 factorial design, adults with overweight/obesity (N = 60) will be randomly assigned to receive standard dietary change strategies (ON/OFF) and dissonance-based strategies (ON/OFF). All participants will receive an introductory educational workshop on UPFs. Those assigned to receive at least one of the interventions (i.e., SDC, dissonance, or both) will attend weekly group sessions for weeks 2-8. DISCUSSION: We expect that receiving either of the strategies will lead to meaningful reductions in UPF intake, improvement in dietary quality, and reduction in weight, and that the combined effects of these strategies will be synergistic. Additionally, dissonance-inducing strategies are hypothesized to reduce outcome disparity for individuals with socio-structural barriers to healthy eating. If successful, the intervention will be tested in a larger trial with a longer intervention and follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07226336.

Indexed as

Cognitive DissonanceFast FoodsObesityOverweightAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitive dissonance, overweightDietary changeObesityUltra-processed food (UPF)

Identifiers

PMID42031230
PMCPMC13421077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.