ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026
A cognitive dissonance-based intervention to reduce ultra-processed food intake: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07226336 (Testing a Dissonance-Based Intervention to Reduce Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Via Activism Against the Food Industry), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Testing a Dissonance-Based Intervention to Reduce Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Via Activism Against the Food Industry
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite their harmful mental and physical health effects, ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are highly prevalent in the US. To maximize profits, the UPF industry designs these foods to be hyperpalatable, markets them aggressively, and influences government policies to prevent their regulation. To combat this powerful influence, individuals must be highly motivated to reduce their UPF intake. If participants learn about the harms of the UPF industry and publicly denounce the industry, they are expected to experience strong cognitive dissonance and motivation to reduce their intake of these foods.
methodsThrough a 2 × 2 factorial design, adults with overweight/obesity (N = 60) will be randomly assigned to receive standard dietary change strategies (ON/OFF) and dissonance-based strategies (ON/OFF). All participants will receive an introductory educational workshop on UPFs. Those assigned to receive at least one of the interventions (i.e., SDC, dissonance, or both) will attend weekly group sessions for weeks 2-8. DISCUSSION: We expect that receiving either of the strategies will lead to meaningful reductions in UPF intake, improvement in dietary quality, and reduction in weight, and that the combined effects of these strategies will be synergistic. Additionally, dissonance-inducing strategies are hypothesized to reduce outcome disparity for individuals with socio-structural barriers to healthy eating. If successful, the intervention will be tested in a larger trial with a longer intervention and follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07226336.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.