ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026
Mechanisms, Microenvironments, and Models: Understanding Therapeutic Resistance in Glioblastoma.
Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Integrating Endovascular Drug Delivery into the Therapeutic Landscape of Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Alpha particle therapy in glioblastoma: emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of response, and translational opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite aggressive multimodal therapy, including maximal safe resection, radiation therapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy, median survival remains approximately 16 months, and nearly all tumors recur. Over the past 2 decades, numerous therapies that demonstrated promise in preclinical studies have failed to improve outcomes in randomized clinical trials, underscoring the therapeutic resistance that defines this disease. This resistance arises from the convergence of tumor-intrinsic mechanisms, microenvironmental constraints, and limitations of current preclinical models. In this review, we synthesize advances in understanding the molecular, cellular, and anatomic determinants of resistance to radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies in adult GBM. We highlight how extensive intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity, transcriptional plasticity, and adaptive reprogramming enable tumor cells to evade cytotoxic stress. Key resistance mechanisms include activation of DNA damage response pathways, exploitation of hypoxic niches, therapy-induced mesenchymal transitions, and evasion of immune surveillance through impaired antigen presentation and a profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. We further discuss how GBM exploits the unique immunologic features of the central nervous system, including the blood-brain barrier, limited antigen burden, and tolerogenic myeloid populations, to blunt the efficacy of immunotherapies. A major focus of this review is the role of preclinical models in shaping our understanding of therapeutic resistance. We critically evaluate established cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, syngeneic models, and genetically engineered mouse models, emphasizing both their strengths and their inability to fully recapitulate defining features of human GBM. Finally, we outline emerging strategies to overcome resistance, including rational combination therapies, adaptive trial designs, improved biomarker-driven stratification, and integrative modeling approaches. Together, these insights provide a framework for translating mechanistic understanding into more effective, durable therapies for glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.