ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Deep Learning Model Using Transfer Learning for Detecting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Retrospective Algorithm Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence-augmented electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) models for detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) often exhibit degraded performance in patients with comorbidities. Objective: This study aimed to introduce and validate a recalibration method using longitudinal patient data to enhance prediction accuracy and simulate its clinical utility for ongoing monitoring. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using data from 2 hospitals in Korea. A dataset of paired transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) and electrocardiograms (ECGs) matched within a 2-week interval was constructed, separating pairs into baseline (first for each patient) and follow-up assessments. In addition to conventional supervised learning, we developed a patient-wise recalibration strategy that incorporated historical left ventricular ejection fraction measurements and prior AI-ECG outputs to adjust for future predictions, thus empirically mitigating confounding effects. Pretraining was also implemented to enhance the model's performance. Results: The recalibrated 12-lead DeepECG LVSD model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.956 (95% CI 0.946-0.965) for internal validation and 0.940 (95% CI 0.936-0.945) for external validation of follow-up TTE-ECG pairs. The uncalibrated 12-lead DeepECG LVSD model also showed modest performance, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.953 (95% CI 0.941-0.965) in the internal validation and 0.947 (95% CI 0.943-0.951) in the external validation when tested on baseline TTE-ECG pairs. Recalibration yielded statistically significant improvements in the 12-lead DeepECG LVSD models (P<.001), with enhanced and more balanced performance across all clinical subgroups. Conclusions: Patient-wise recalibration improved accuracy and consistency across various comorbidities by mitigating performance degradation and bias. This broadens the application of AI-ECG for LVSD detection from low-risk screening to high-risk longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.