SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2026
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Campylobacter Species Prevalence in Chicken in Italy.
Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Campylobacter is responsible for campylobacteriosis, the most reported foodborne gastrointestinal infection in humans in the European Union, and broiler meat was the food primarily associated with outbreaks with stronger evidence. This study aimed to revise the literature and estimate the pooled prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in three different chicken matrices in Italy from 2003 to 2023, as well as potential subgroup moderators to the observed value. The total number of eligible studies was 48. On the basis of the meta-analysis, skin and faeces matrices exhibited a high pooled proportion of Campylobacter spp., 0.62 and 0.67, respectively, whereas meat had the lowest proportion of 0.20%, with high heterogeneity detected in the three matrices I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.