Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Bayesian probabilistic projections of proportions with limited data: An application to subnational contraceptive method supply shares.

Hannah Comiskey, Niamh Cahill, Leontine Alkema, David T Frazier, Worapree Maneesoonthorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah ComiskeyDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0034-6725
Niamh CahillDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland.
Leontine AlkemaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David T FrazierDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Worapree ManeesoonthornDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging the private sector in contraceptive method supply is critical for creating equitable, sustainable, and accessible healthcare systems. To achieve this, it is essential to understand where women obtain their modern contraceptives. While national-level estimates provide valuable insights into overall trends in contraceptive supply, they often obscure variation within and across subnational regions. Addressing localised needs has become increasingly important as countries adopt decentralised models for family planning services. Decentralization has also underscored the need for reliable subnational estimates of key family planning indicators. The absence of regularly collected subnational data has hindered effective monitoring and decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel approach that leverages latent attributes in Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data to produce Bayesian probabilistic projections of contraceptive method supply shares (the proportions of modern contraceptive methods supplied by public and private sectors) with limited data. Our modelling framework is built on Bayesian hierarchical models. Using penalized splines to track public and private supply shares over time, we leverage the spatial nature of the data and incorporate a correlation structure between recent supply share observations at national and subnational levels. This framework contributes to the domain of subnational estimation of proportions in data-sparse settings, outperforming comparable and previous approaches. As decentralization continues to reshape family planning services, producing reliable subnational estimates of key indicators is increasingly vital for researchers and policymakers.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesBayes TheoremFemaleHumansPrivate SectorContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID42030401
PMCPMC13108902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.