Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An online stigma reduction education program for healthcare workers working with people who inject drugs: Development.

Sandy Ezepue, Afolasade Fakolade, Tim O'Shea, Setareh Ghahari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandy EzepueHamilton Urban Core Community Health Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6517-1387
Afolasade FakoladeQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5782
Tim O'SheaShelter Health Network, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Setareh GhahariQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada has a high prevalence of people who inject drugs (PWID), many of whom experience limited access to necessary diagnosis, treatment, and support. PWID often avoid seeking care due to stigma from healthcare workers (HCWs). Implementing a stigma reduction education program for HCWs could improve healthcare outcomes for PWID by fostering compassionate, evidence-based approaches to care, enabling HCWs to overcome biases and deliver non-judgmental care. The objective of this study is to determine the content and format for the development of an online stigma reduction education program for HCWs working with PWID. To accomplish that, we completed interviews with PWID and focus groups with HCWs to obtain input about the content and format for the development of an online stigma reduction education program. PWID provided input on the content of the education program, highlighting the importance of module topics through personal accounts of encountering judgment and discrimination in healthcare settings, which led to their reluctance to seek available services due to fear of stigma. HCWs who participated in the focus groups provided input on the content and reached a consensus regarding the format to inform the program development. Through feedback, participants contributed to shaping the content and format, informing the development of a stigma reduction education program. These findings supported the development and refinement of a program prototype to guide future feasibility and effectiveness evaluations.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelSocial StigmaSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdultCanadaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInternetMale

Identifiers

PMID42030360
PMCPMC13108893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.