Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030357›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The application of large language models in meteorology graduate research: current status, impact, and prospects.

Siguang Zhu, Honghui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siguang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-1211
Honghui LiState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have gradually integrated into various fields, demonstrating significant potential, particularly in meteorological research. This study explores the current application, advantages, challenges, and future development trends of LLMs in the scientific work of meteorology graduate students at NUIST. Through surveys and case analysis, the study finds that LLMs are primarily applied in literature review, data processing, code development, and academic writing in meteorological research. The results show that LLMs significantly enhance research efficiency, particularly in code development and literature translation, saving considerable time for graduate students. However, challenges remain in areas such as the accuracy of professional knowledge, creative inspiration, and interdisciplinary integration. The study also reveals concerns over data security, academic integrity, and model limitations when using LLMs. Future applications of LLMs in meteorology need further optimization in terms of professional knowledge accuracy and data processing capabilities. This paper provides both theoretical support and practical guidance for the responsible integration of LLMs into meteorological research and education.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateLarge Language ModelsMeteorologyResearchGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID42030357
PMCPMC13108733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.