Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030346›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Resilient road safety modeling through spatially disaggregated explainable AI.

Huashan Ye, Baowen Wu, Dong Yuan, Xue Yang, Qiao Peng, Ruibing Kou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huashan YeSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Wenshan University, Wenshan, China.
Baowen WuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Wenshan University, Wenshan, China.
Dong YuanSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Wenshan University, Wenshan, China.
Xue YangQueen's Business School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Qiao PengShenzhen Research Institute of Shandong University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-3932
Ruibing KouSchool of Design and Art, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding spatial disparities in traffic accident severity is essential not only for improving transport safety but also for advancing sustainable and inclusive transportation systems. Road crashes represent a persistent public health and equity challenge, directly linked to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities). This study proposes an explainable, spatially segmented machine learning framework to examine urban-rural heterogeneity in crash outcomes, using disaggregated accident data from Kent, UK (2022-2024). By treating urban and rural systems as separate analytical units, the study captures risk heterogeneity that conventional pooled approaches often obscure. Among five tested models, Random Forest achieved the best performance and was further interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to uncover how key factors differ in influence across spatial contexts. The results reveal a behavioral risk profile dominating in urban areas and infrastructure-driven risks in rural environments. These findings highlight the need for context-sensitive, evidence-based interventions that ensure transport equity across regions. Additionally, the study contributes to sustainable governance frameworks, enabling spatially adaptive risk mitigation, inclusive policy design and the long-term resilience of transport infrastructures.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficMachine LearningSafetyHumansRandom ForestRural Population

Identifiers

PMID42030346
PMCPMC13108897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.