Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030343›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Machine learning identifies pupil size and corneal thickness as key predictors of axial elongation rate.

Peng Zhou, Sitong Chen, Yingli Li, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peng ZhouOptometry Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-5167
Sitong ChenOptometry Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yingli LiOptometry Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LiOptometry Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1157-7520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for myopia progression using ocular biometric parameters to provide an objective assessment tool for clinical practice.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at Shanghai Parkway Health Ophthalmology Department as the training set, and myopic individuals from the Optometry Center of Peking University People's Hospital as the validation set. Demographic and biometric data were collected, including central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K-value), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal diameter (WTW), and pupil size (PS). Seven machine learning models (e.g., XGBoost, random forest, support vector machine) were employed for modeling, with performance optimized via 5-fold cross-validation. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²), and variable importance was analyzed.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the training and validation sets (all P > 0.05). The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving R² = 0.913 (MSE = 0.005) on the training set and R² = 0.766 (MSE = 0.016) on the test set. Variable importance analysis revealed pupil size (score 100) and corneal thickness (40.88) as the key predictors of axial elongation rate, followed by age of onset (17.96).

conclusionThe machine learning-based prediction model effectively utilizes ocular biometric data to assess myopia progression risk, with pupil size and corneal thickness identified as core predictive factors. This model provides a quantitative tool for early clinical intervention. Future studies should expand the sample size and incorporate additional biomarkers to optimize performance.

Indexed as

CorneaMachine LearningMyopiaPupilAdultBiometryBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42030343
PMCPMC13108789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.