ArticlePloS one2026
Voronoi tessellation as a complement or replacement for confidence ellipses in the visualization of data projection and clustering results.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visualizing two-dimensional data projections with group-wise coloring and confidence ellipses is a standard approach in biomedical data analysis. However, this method can obscure subtle group overlaps or atypical cases. Voronoi tessellation, which is widely used in crystallography to analyze local structure, offers a parameter-free geometric alternative that can improve the evaluation of group structure in raw or projected data. We implemented Voronoi tessellation as a plot type for two-dimensional biomedical data and compared it with confidence ellipses on three artificial datasets and three biomedical datasets. For datasets with well-separated classes, both visualization techniques effectively delineated groups. Voronoi tessellation more clearly highlighted cases with points overlapping the opposite group, revealed internal group heterogeneity, and enabled quantification of structural discordance via a Voronoi island count as a visualization-intrinsic metric with no equivalent in confidence ellipse approaches. In datasets with moderate or absent group separation, Voronoi tessellation more effectively exposed the lack of meaningful structure, whereas confidence ellipses more clearly indicated distant outliers. Voronoi tessellation also facilitated the identification of clustering failures. Thus, Voronoi tessellation enhances the detection of deviations from expected group patterns and provides geometric insights that complement statistical summaries from confidence ellipses. Therefore, integrating Voronoi tessellation into standard data analysis workflows is a valuable addition for visualizing biomedical data and supports hypothesis validation and exploratory analyses in both raw data visualization and dimensionality reduction or clustering. An R library "VoronoiBiomedPlot" is available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at https://cran.r-project.org/package=VoronoiBiomedPlot.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.