ArticlePloS one2026
Psychometric properties of the Probability Bias Measure.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probability bias is the tendency to think that negative events are relatively likely to happen, and that positive events are relatively unlikely to happen. It is reliably associated with depressive and anxious symptom severity. Here, we describe the initial development and testing of the Probability Bias Measure, which is designed to be relatively brief and general, allowing its convenient use with different populations. In two samples of Turkish-speaking students (Ns = 228 and 170), probability estimates for 12 positive and 12 negative events both displayed adequate one-factor structure, and good internal consistency. More importantly, probability bias - the difference between a participant's mean probability estimate for negative events, and their mean probability estimate for positive events - showed excellent convergent validity, in that it correlated with depressive and anxious symptom severity, positive and negative mood, hopelessness, and dispositional optimism. Furthermore, probability bias accounted for additional variance in depressive symptom severity, over and above that already accounted for by hopelessness and dispositional optimism, which supports its discriminant validity. These findings provide preliminary support for the validity of the Probability Bias Measure for research with Turkish-speaking populations; we also discuss initial evidence for the validity of its English version. The full measure is provided in Turkish and English.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.