ArticlePloS one2026
A prospective observational study evaluating the short-term effectiveness of residential care for adolescents as "service as usual": A study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research indicates worse outcomes for children and young people in out-of-home care compared to their peers. To improve the quality of current residential care, research is needed to deepen our understanding of the key factors and mechanisms that explain the effectiveness of residential care on child level. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term (i.e., during care) effectiveness of residential care as a child welfare intervention by different service providers. The study includes two pre-specified primary child-level outcomes 1) psychosocial functioning, assessed through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) including both total difficulties scores and subscales and 2) attainment of individual goals of the child. Secondary outcome measures include improved experiences of emotional warmth and safety (CEWSS-A). Further associations between key characteristics of the residential care unit, the child and outcomes are assessed. The data consist of longitudinal survey data collected from 12-17-year-old children and staff in a total sample of public and private residential care units offering specialized care in three wellbeing services countries in Finland. The baseline (T0) data is collected between 1.4.2025-31.8.2026 with a follow up of 6 and 12 months for each child (T1 and T2). The data is primarily analysed with linear mixed models. Findings explore the short-term effectiveness and change mechanisms of residential care as "service as usual" to understand how it should be organised and produced to improve its ability to meet aims during care. The study design embraces the complexity and changeability on different levels of the residential care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.