ArticlePloS one2026
Factors affecting feeding choices in infants and toddlers in northern Jordan: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreastfeeding is a key determinant of infant health and survival; however, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates remain low worldwide. Various maternal, infant, and socioeconomic factors influence the feeding practices.
objectiveThe main objective of this study was to identify maternal, infant, and socioeconomic determinants of infant feeding practices during the first six months of life among mothers in northern Jordan.
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Princess Rahma and Prince Rashid Hospitals in Irbid City, northern Jordan, from December 2023 to February 2024. Mothers of healthy infants aged 6-24 months participated in a survey that gathered information on their demographics, feeding practices, and other infant-related details. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the associations and key predictors of feeding type.
resultsAmong the 508 mothers who participated in this study, 29.9% were exclusively breastfeeding, 46.5% used mixed feeding, and 23.6% opted for formula feeding. The key factors influencing these choices include maternal health issues, work hours, and infant birth weight. Maternal illness was identified as the strongest predictor of exclusive artificial feeding (AOR = 12.72; 95% CI: 4.10-39.45; P < 0.001). Low birth weight (<2.5 kg) was also associated with higher odds of artificial feeding (AOR = 4.75; 95% CI: 2.08-10.88; p < 0.001). Maternal employment significantly increased the likelihood of mixed feeding compared with EBF (AOR = 3.54; 95% CI: 1.65-7.60; p = 0.001). Surprisingly, no significant correlation was found between maternal education, family income, cultural factors, and feeding methods.
conclusionThis study highlighted the low exclusive breastfeeding rate, emphasizing the need for improved support systems to encourage breastfeeding in the form of workplace accommodations and healthcare counseling to address barriers to its practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.