ArticlePloS one2026
CMAP-Fusion: A cross-modal feature selection and model pruning framework for laboratory and imaging data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-modal fusion of medical imaging and laboratory data is a key pathway for accurate diagnosis of diseases, yet it is constrained by issues such as the modal heterogeneity gap, accumulation of feature redundancy, and efficiency imbalance. Existing methods struggle to balance precision and clinical adaptability, and some rely on simulated data leading to limited generalization ability. To address these challenges, we propose the Cross-Modal Alignment-Pruning Fusion model (CMAP-Fusion), which achieves optimization through modular collaboration of "encoding alignment → redundant pruning → fusion prediction": ViT-B/16 is used to complete imaging feature extraction and dimension alignment, the SmartTrim dynamic pruning module screens key features and reduces redundancy, and the Cross-Modal Transformer (CMT) mines deep associations between dual modalities. Experiments on the COVID-19 Radiography Dataset, ISIC Skin Cancer Dataset, and ChestX-ray14 Dataset demonstrate that the model achieves accuracies of 95.3%, 89.7%, and 93.6% respectively, representing an improvement of 3.1% to 4.1% compared with optimal baselines. Meanwhile, the number of parameters is reduced by 44.2%, computational complexity is decreased by more than 43%, and cross-modal similarity and feature sparsity are significantly superior to baselines. This model realizes the synergistic optimization of "precision-efficiency-generalization," providing an efficient solution for medical cross-modal fusion. In the future, we will expand to multi-source modalities and multi-disease scenarios, strengthen clinical multi-center validation, further improve the model's interpretability and clinical acceptance, and facilitate the lightweight deployment of medical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.