ArticlePLOS global public health2026
A qualitative study of the ecology of stigma experiences - An application of the ecological model to stigma experiences of trans-women from Ghana. BSGH019.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-012.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trans-women in Ghana experience stigma from institutions, social groups, and individuals. Yet, studies are needed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the nature of stigma experienced by trans-women, especially in Ghana and West Africa. This study employs an ecological model to qualitatively explore the ecology of stigma experiences of trans-women living in urban slums in Accra, Ghana (N = 20). Findings revealed stigma across various ecological levels. At the public policy level, the LGBTQ+ bill emerged as a key driver of stigma. Various subcategories related to this bill included: (a) Restricted freedoms of expression and isolation from harm, (b) LGBTQ+ bill potential for facilitating violence, and (c) fear of arrest and jail time. At the institutional level, trans-women encountered stigma in three areas. The first was in the healthcare sector involving rude gestures and behaviors. The second was from law enforcement officers and included (a) harassing attitudes from law officers, and (b) extortion. Community-level stigma encompassed: (a) insults, name-calling, (b) possible harm from gender expression, and (c) fear of attacks. At the interpersonal level, Trans-women experienced: (a) invasion of privacy, (b) leaving home due to safety, (c) threat of bodily harm, and (d) rejection. At the individual/self-stigma level, trans-women experienced (a) self-doubt and internal struggles, and (b) sense of regret and guilt. Findings highlight the unique experiences and pervasive and multi-layered stigma faced by trans-women across different levels of society. Addressing stigma experiences requires a multi-tiered approach that tackles issues from public policy to individual self-acceptance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.