Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030274›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Unpacking the dual psychological paths of employee-AI collaboration on creativity: The role of proactive behavior.

Baorong Guo, Zaifeng Wu, Quan Wen, Yifeng Peng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Baorong GuoSchool of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-8941
Zaifeng WuSchool of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Quan WenDepartment of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yifeng PengSchool of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into organizational settings has significantly transformed employees' work patterns, underscoring the need to investigate the mechanisms through which employee-AI collaboration influences creativity. Grounded in social cognitive theory, this study examines how employee-AI collaboration affects creativity via internal (self-efficacy) and external (performance pressure) mechanisms, and explores the moderating role of proactive behavior. Using convenience sampling, 733 valid responses were collected from six technology-driven enterprises. The theoretical model was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and regression analyses using AMOS and the Process macro for SPSS. Our results reveal that employee-AI collaboration is positively associated with creativity through two statistically supported indirect pathways: parallel indirect effects via self-efficacy (internal pathway) and performance pressure (external pathway), and a sequential indirect association in which higher self-efficacy is related to higher performance pressure, which in turn is positively related to creativity. Moreover, proactive behavior appears to moderate these relationships, such that the association between employee-AI collaboration and self-efficacy is more pronounced at higher levels of proactive behavior, whereas the association between employee-AI collaboration and performance pressure is less pronounced at higher levels of proactive behavior, yielding a pattern consistent with moderated indirect effects on creativity through both routes. These findings provide theoretical insights into the complex psychological processes underlying creativity in AI-enabled work environments and offer practical implications for optimizing AI applications and developing targeted interventions to foster employee creativity.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCooperative BehaviorCreativityHumansSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42030274
PMCPMC13108763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.