Trial reportCancer medicine2026
Mecapegfilgrastim for Prophylaxis of Immunochemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Pilot Trial.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Febrile neutropenia in adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving first-line R-CHOP-based therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and trial evidence.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim for preventing immunochemotherapy-induced neutropenia in treatment-naive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
methodsIn this open-label, multicenter exploratory trial, patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive mecapegfilgrastim or no prophylaxis. All participants received 4 cycles of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia during cycle 1.
resultsBetween October 2021 and June 2024, 42 patients were enrolled (mecapegfilgrastim: n = 28; control: n = 14). Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in cycle 1 occurred in 32.14% of the mecapegfilgrastim group versus 64.29% in the control group. Across all cycles, mecapegfilgrastim consistently reduced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia; nadir neutrophil counts were higher and the need for short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was lower in the mecapegfilgrastim group (all nominal p ≤ 0.05). No cases of febrile neutropenia occurred in the mecapegfilgrastim group, compared to one case in the control group. Objective response rates were 75.0% (95% CI: 55.1, 89.3) and 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9, 82.3), respectively (nominal p = 0.298). Mecapegfilgrastim reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia regardless of treatment response. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 42.9% of the mecapegfilgrastim group and 92.9% of controls; serious TEAEs were reported in 7.1% of patients in both groups.
conclusionsMecapegfilgrastim demonstrated a favorable safety profile and potential efficacy in reducing the incidence and severity of neutropenia in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. These findings may support its prophylactic use in this population and warrant validation in larger trials.
trial registrationchictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2100048196. Registered on July 4, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.