ArticlePloS one2026
Comparison of deep learning-based three-dimensional human pose estimation methods with motion capture for gesture research.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans often make gestures while speaking. These gestures have been extensively researched in psychology and cognitive science, revealing their functions and roles in communication. Despite being produced in three-dimensional (3D) space, gestures and gesture space have primarily been measured and analyzed using two-dimensional planes. Optical motion capture (MoCap) is commonly used for 3D gesture measurement. However, MoCap is expensive, requires a large space, and the attachment of retroreflective markers can interfere with the natural generation of gestures by the speaker. Recent advances in deep learning-based human pose estimation (HPE) offer promising alternatives by enabling 3D keypoint estimation from standard video cameras. This study investigates the accuracy of four HPEs-two monocular and two stereo with triangulation methods-in estimating upper-body keypoints commonly used in natural scenarios for gesture research. Ten participants were recorded performing gesture-rich speech by both a MoCap system and three video cameras. We compared 13 keypoints, including the wrists, elbows, shoulders, fingers, and face, with MoCap data, using Euclidean distance as an error metric. Statistical analyses revealed that stereo methods significantly outperformed monocular methods across all keypoints. The most accurate method achieved an average error of 49.4 mm with respect to MoCap, suggesting sufficient accuracy for practical gesture analysis. Additionally, we visualized 3D gesture spaces and found a 75.4% overlap between HPE and MoCap at a voxel size of 50 mm, indicating high spatial agreement. Our findings demonstrate that stereo HPE methods are viable, cost-effective alternatives to MoCap in gesture-related applications. Our ultimate objective is to create a toolbox that is accurate and easy to use for measuring human gestures in 3D space by exploiting the recent advances in HPE as an alternative to MoCap. Such a toolbox will be suitable for non-experts in machine learning, and these results lay the foundation for it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.