ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Machine learning multiscale collective cell dynamics: From single-cell characterization to multicellular monolayer modeling.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collective cell dynamics are fundamental to numerous physiological processes, including embryo development, tissue morphogenesis, immune response, and disease progression. Accurately modeling these dynamics across scales remains challenging, as traditional physics-based models usually rely on many unmeasurable parameters and unclear active physics, limiting their ability to capture both single-cell features and emergent multicellular behaviors. Here, we introduce a scale-adaptive hybrid machine learning (ML) framework, in which complementary physics-guided and physics-agnostic method each resolves an above key issue at single-cell and multicellular scales, respectively. The physics-guided ML method integrates physical models with experimental data to infer previously unmeasurable parameters, enabling more accurate characterization of single-cell shape and velocity features, but unknown active forces and inherent physical assumptions still constrain its ability to predict multicellular scale dynamics. In contrast, the physics-agnostic ML method bypasses explicit physical assumptions to directly model multicellular behaviors from historical state sequences. This method provides robust long-term predictions of coarse-grained density oscillations and waves observed experimentally, yet it suffers from high stochasticity when applied to single-cell scale modeling. By assigning each approach to the scale where it is most effective, our framework leverages their respective strengths while mitigating their limitations. This complementary strategy bridges the gap between theoretical modeling and experimental observations, offering a versatile computational paradigm for multiscale collective cell dynamics with broad potential in diverse physiological and pathological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.