ArticleGenetics2026
Targeted allele frequency tuning in breeding populations via alternative optimum contribution selection.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When managing the rate of genomic inbreeding using genomic relationship matrices, allele frequencies tend to be moved toward the frequencies used for centering genotypes in those matrices. Here, we explore if this behavior could be exploited to purposefully change the frequency of alleles. We test the method in a simulated toy example and in the Friesian horse population to purge deleterious alleles as a case study. We show that the average entry of the numerator matrix from VanRaden's method 1 (ZZ'¯) equals 4 times the average squared difference between the populations' allele frequency (AF) and the used centering allele frequency (CAF) (ZZ'¯=4∑k=1nsnp(AFk-CAFk)2). By setting the centering frequency to the desired AF and subsequently optimizing contributions to minimize the average matrix entry, the population's AF is shifted to the desired frequency. We call this novel selection method using a matrix: "TAFT" (targeted allele frequency tuning), and use it with optimum contribution selection (OCS) in this study (TAFT-OCS). TAFT outperformed index methods for target frequencies between 0% and 100%. The index methods showed different behavior compared to TAFT by exerting different selection pressure on loci depending on the difference to the target frequency. Frequencies of all 12 deleterious alleles could be reduced within ∼6 generations in the Friesian horse population so that no affected individuals remained. At the same time, genetic gain of 3.7 cm withers height (1.11 gSD) per generation was made and the realized pedigree inbreeding rate kept below 0.5%. We propose TAFT-OCS as a novel method to directly change allele frequencies to any desired value which is particularly beneficial if intermediate allele frequencies are desired or genetic diversity should be maintained. TAFT shifts the focus of selection from individuals to alleles. It only requires to set a desired target frequency and a minimum and maximum allowed frequency if needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.