ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026
From 3D Surface Documentation to Visualization in Forensic Practice: A Review of Current Methods and Emerging Technologies.
Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signed in bone: Toolmark identification of a machete and multidisciplinary 3D reconstruction in a homicide investigation.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Next-generation forensic 3D surface documentation with projection-assisted digital spray multicamera photogrammetry and 3D gaussian splatting.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- From 3D Surface Documentation to Visualization in Forensic Practice: A Review of Current Methods and Emerging Technologies.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate documentation of bodies, injuries, death scenes, accidents, and crime scenes is fundamental to forensic investigations. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) photography and written reports have inherent limitations in representing complex spatial relationships. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) surface documentation technologies, including laser-scanning, structured light scanning, and photogrammetry, have been integrated into forensic practice to provide accurate, measurable, and reproducible digital evidence. This review provides an overview of current 3D methods and discusses their principles, advantages, and typical applications in documenting crime scenes and human remains. Furthermore, it introduces emerging image-based reconstruction approaches, such as neural radiance fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian splatting (3DGS), which generate high-quality reconstructions from multiple images. The integration of 3D data into immersive environments, such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), is also addressed, highlighting its potential in forensic analysis, courtroom presentation, and education. With the rapid evolution of 3D technologies, it is essential to understand the strengths and limitations of each technique in forensic applications. Future developments in algorithms and immersive integration will expand digital forensic capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.