ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Cooling effect of evaporative misters in outdoor restaurant areas: case study of Novi Sad, Serbia.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuing urbanization, together with climate change manifestations, including the increasing frequency and intensity of heat waves, prompts the adoption of various cooling interventions in urban outdoor spaces. Evaporative misting systems have gained popularity as a cost-effective heat mitigation measure, particularly in hospitality venues. However, their effectiveness in moderate climates remains understudied. This study evaluated the effectiveness of these systems in restaurant outdoor seating areas in Novi Sad, Serbia, during hot summer days in 2022 and 2023. Simultaneous micrometeorological measurements were conducted at multiple locations in restaurant outdoor seating areas (sun-exposed, shaded, misted, and non-misted sites), with mean radiant temperature (MRT), Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET), and Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) being calculated. Additionally, to capture subjective perceptions of microclimatic conditions, questionnaire surveys were conducted with restaurant guests. Results revealed significant location-specific variability in cooling effectiveness. The most favorable thermal conditions occurred in shade; however, in sun-exposed locations, misting systems showed inconsistent performance, sometimes even worsening thermal conditions. Despite these inconsistencies, questionnaire results showed that guests consistently perceived improved thermal comfort under misting systems. Further research should include measurements across different times of day and seasons in moderate climates and across different misting types and intervals to better understand misting systems' cooling benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.