ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Sonographic pediatric liver size standards based on generalized additive modeling in a diverse population.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn pediatric radiology, assessment of liver size is a fundamental component of abdominal imaging, reflecting both normal hepatic growth and potential pathologic processes. Limitations in prior literature, along with evolving demographic characteristics of the pediatric population, highlight the need for updated, methodologically rigorous reference ranges for normal liver size on ultrasound.
objectiveThis study aims to establish contemporary ultrasound-based reference ranges for pediatric liver size, incorporating both age and height as key variables. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, radiology reports from January 2014 to December 2024 for patients under 18 years of age were reviewed. Patients with an impression of "normal abdominal ultrasound" were included, excluding those with liver diseases or abnormal Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) results. Standard liver length measurement for our institution is the craniocaudal dimension of the right lobe along the midclavicular line. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) with the Box-Cox Power Exponential (BCPE) distribution was used to create reference ranges based on patients' age and height.
resultsA total of 4,611 abdominal ultrasound examinations met the inclusion criteria. The study included 2,055 males (44.6%) and 2,556 females (55.4%). At birth, the liver size ranged from 4.9 to 5.5 cm (cm), increasing progressively with age to a maximum of 17.2 cm in adolescents aged 17-18 years. A subset of 3,235 examinations (70%) with recorded height was used for GAMLSS modeling, showing a more linear increase in liver size with height. Reference ranges were reported up to 180 cm in height, with a maximum liver size of 17.5 cm.
conclusionThis study provides updated reference ranges and nomograms for pediatric liver size based on age and height, which support a normal liver size slightly higher than previously reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.