Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029901›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Management of geriatric ankle fractures-Conservative treatment works well].

Verena Hecht, Thomas Lustenberger, Helen Anwander

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Verena HechtOrthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie, Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Schweiz.
Thomas LustenbergerOrthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie, Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Schweiz.
Helen AnwanderOrthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie, Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Schweiz. helen.anwander@insel.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric ankle fractures require treatment strategies aimed at early, safe mobilization with a risk of complications as low as possible. Surgical procedures are associated with an increased perioperative risk.

objectiveTo determine which fractures can be safely managed conservatively in older patients and which criteria are decisive. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review of the literature on randomized trials and systematic reviews.

resultsStable fractures, including Weber A and stable Weber B fractures, isolated medial malleolar fractures (Herscovici types A-C), and non-displaced posterior malleolar fractures, can be treated conservatively with full weight-bearing as tolerated when ankle stability is confirmed. The assessment of ankle stability using radiographs of weight bearing is decisive, optionally supplemented by stress views or computed tomography (CT) during weight bearing. Even fractures with radiological signs of instability can be managed conservatively in selected cases of geriatric patients when the individual frailty and mobility are taken into consideration. Randomized trials demonstrate no functional advantage of surgery over conservative treatment with full-contact casts in patients older than 60 years.

conclusionWith appropriate patient selection, conservative treatment represents an evidence-based and functionally comparable treatment option with lower complication rates than surgery.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesConservative TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeWeight-BearingCastEarly weightbearingFrailtyMobilityPatient selection

Identifiers

PMID42029901
PMCPMC13421276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.