ArticleDiscover oncology2026
A novel LncRNA signature associated with cuproptosis for prognostic prediction and immune response assessment in rectum adenocarcinoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCuproptosis, a novel form of cell death, induces protein-toxic stress before leading to cell demise. However, studies exploring long noncoding RNA (LncRNA) related to cuproptosis in Rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) are limited. This study aims to identify prognostic markers associated with cuproptosis-related LncRNAs and their relationship with the immune microenvironment in READ using bioinformatics approaches.
methodsRNA sequencing, genetic mutations, copy number variations, and clinical data for TCGA_READ were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). READ patients were randomly assigned to either a training cohort or a validation cohort. In the training cohort, the prognostic model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression models. The prognostic significance of the model was further validated in both the validation and full cohorts. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), immune-related activities, and functional enrichment analyses (Gene Ontology [GO] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [KEGG]) were performed to explore the relationship between LncRNAs and cuproptosis.
resultsFrom existing literature, we identified 22 genes associated with cuproptosis. Using co-expression analysis, we identified 421 LncRNAs related to cuproptosis. Cox regression analysis led to the identification of four cuproptosis-related LncRNAs (GPRACR, LINC01555, NIHCOLE, and MPC1-DT) as prognostic markers. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with higher mortality rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor. A nomogram was constructed using multivariate Cox regression to predict the survival outcomes of READ patients. The TMB in the low-risk group was significantly higher than in the high-risk group, and patients with low-risk scores and high TMB had the best OS. Using the Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) algorithm, we observed significant differences in immune markers, including TAM_M2, IFNG, and CD8, between the high- and low-risk groups.
conclusionIn conclusion, the four cuproptosis-related LncRNAs identified in this study serve as reliable prognostic markers for READ patients. These findings provide novel insights into potential immunotherapeutic strategies and clinical applications in the management of READ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.