ReviewJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Zero/Low-fluoroscopy pulsed-field ablation approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluoroless Workflow for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Sphere-9 and VARIPULSE Catheters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy and safety of pulsed-field (PFA) ablation with zero/low-fluoroscopy (ZF/LF) approach is unclear with previous evidence limited to thermal technique.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, were systematically searched for studies reporting outcomes of ZF approach with PFA. Proportions were pooled with a random-effects model using an arcsine transformation to adjust for extreme values.
results14 observational studies were included, comprising a total of 1005 patients who underwent a reduced fluoroscopy pulsed field ablation approach. The pooled acute success rate was 100% (95% CI: 1.0–1.0; I2 = 0%) with a low arrhythmia recurrence rate in the descriptive analysis. The prevalence of complications was also low. Furthermore, the mean procedure time was 80.9 min (95% CI 64.86–97.11; I2 = 99.4%) and the mean total left atrial dwell time was 46 min (95% CI 32.0–61.5; I2 = 96.9%).
conclusionIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, PFA ZF/LF approach demonstrates technical feasibility and favorable safety profile in selected observational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.