ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Submarine outfall relocation and the reduction of microbiological risk in bathing waters.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urbanisation of coastal zones increases sewage loads and microbiological risks in bathing waters. This study evaluates whether relocating a planned submarine outfall can reduce these risks while preserving suitable bathing conditions along the Itaipuaçu coast, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A coupled framework integrates three-dimensional hydrodynamics, near-field plume simulations, and a Lagrangian far-field transport model with an E. coli decay formulation driven by solar radiation, temperature, and salinity. Hydrodynamic fields forced by tides, large-scale circulation, and local and remote winds were validated against in situ current measurements during winter conditions. Deterministic simulations and a probabilistic analysis quantified E. coli concentrations and the percentage of time that bathing-water thresholds (800 MPN/100 ml) are exceeded in the vicinity of the outfall diffuser and along the shoreline. Results show that an alternative outfall location eliminates plume contact with Maricas Islands, maintains compliant shoreline bathing waters, and reduces outfall length, providing a transferable framework for optimising regional submarine outfall design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.