Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029873›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2026

Robust machine learning and ensemble learning approach to predict variation in experimental data for multiple measurements and anomalies.

Yuta Sakai, Motosuke Katayama, Hiromasa Kaneko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuta SakaiDepartment of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 214-8571, Japan.
Motosuke KatayamaNitto Denko Corporation, 1-1-2 Shimohozumi, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-8680, Japan.
Hiromasa KanekoDepartment of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 214-8571, Japan. hkaneko@meiji.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-6476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of chemistry, machine learning is widely used to develop desired properties and activities y of compounds and products from experimental conditions x. As y is measured several times, a mathematical model is constructed with y as the average value of these measurements, which cannot evaluate the variability of y. Therefore, a method was proposed to predict the variability of y by creating N sub-datasets with selected y values for each sample and constructing multiple models. However, this method reduces prediction accuracy when there are abnormal values due to measurement errors. To address these issues, we proposed a robust method that constructs multiple sub-datasets and selects only the models with the lowest mean absolute error for predictions. Validation on a film thickness and haze (light scattering intensity) dataset showed that the proposed method outperformed conventional approaches, including those that remove anomalies in advance, in predicting both the mean and variation of y. The proposed method could improve accuracy in datasets with multiple values of y and containing abnormal values without removing samples.

Indexed as

Abnormal valuesDouble cross-validationEnsemble learningModel selectionOutlier robustnessRepeated measurementsRobust machine learningVariability prediction

Identifiers

PMID42029873
PMCPMC13294238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.