ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Parent Perspectives on Mobile Health Autism Screeners.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMobile health (mHealth) screening tools for autism are gaining in prevalence and have the potential to improve inequities in autism screening for families of color and/or low-income families. It is unclear whether current tools will reduce disparities or further help those already advantaged in autism care.
methodsUser testing and qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 English and/or Spanish speaking parents of children with high or low autism likelihood and were less than 5 years old. Parents were low-income and/or a parent of a child of color. Parents were asked about their general technology knowledge in phone interviews and tested 1–2 mHealth autism screening tools at an in-person interview using their own mobile device. Each interview was video-recorded and transcribed. Verbal and non-verbal information was coded using a phenomenological approach to develop key themes. Spanish videos and transcripts were coded in the original language by 2 bilingual team members.
results4 themes and 9 subthemes emerged. These included tool accessibility (e.g. physical/logistical access, parent skills and background), tool usability (e.g. content, design and function), tool purpose and appropriateness (e.g. tool links to resources and next steps, tool role in accessing autism care), and tool acceptability (e.g. data privacy and trust, tool legitimacy and parent trust in tool, tool framing of autism/disability).
conclusionParents suggested improvements such as reducing reading level of text, improved question wording to clarify response options, and making tools shorter to fit in parents’ daily lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.