Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029850›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Neural cognitive diagnosis modeling incorporating response times.

Jianhua Xiong, Mengchao Li, Fen Luo, Wenyi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianhua XiongSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang, 330022, Jiangxi, China. xjh2279@jxnu.edu.cn.
Mengchao LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang, 330022, Jiangxi, China.
Fen LuoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang, 330022, Jiangxi, China.
Wenyi WangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang, 330022, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

Jiangxi Province Technological Innovation Base Program 20242BCC32021National Natural Science Foundation of China 62467003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis is a fundamental issue in the field of intelligent education, aiming to identify students' mastery of specific knowledge concepts. With computerized testing, response time (RT) is a process data that can be collected. Incorporating RT in cognitive diagnosis assessment can enhance diagnostic accuracy. However, RT is only considered in traditional statistical cognitive diagnosis models. Compared with traditional statistical diagnostic models, cognitive diagnosis models based on neural networks have advantages such as high precision and strong generalization ability. Therefore, this paper proposes a JRT-NCD (joint response times neural cognitive diagnosis) model that uses neural networks to model the complex nonlinear interactions between exercises and students and incorporates RT as a new feature to refine diagnostic results on student abilities. Research findings on three datasets of PISA2012, 2MFC, and ASSIST09 indicate that: (1) In comparison with traditional statistical models, neural networks have better fitting capabilities for real complex nonlinear data; (2) compared to the NCD model that disregards RT, JRT-NCD achieves higher diagnostic accuracy while maintaining its interpretability, and reduces the misleading effects of "overspeed behavior" on the diagnostic results.

Indexed as

CognitionNeural Networks, ComputerReaction TimeHumansCognitive diagnosisNeural networkOverspeed behaviorResponse time

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.