ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Neural cognitive diagnosis modeling incorporating response times.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive diagnosis is a fundamental issue in the field of intelligent education, aiming to identify students' mastery of specific knowledge concepts. With computerized testing, response time (RT) is a process data that can be collected. Incorporating RT in cognitive diagnosis assessment can enhance diagnostic accuracy. However, RT is only considered in traditional statistical cognitive diagnosis models. Compared with traditional statistical diagnostic models, cognitive diagnosis models based on neural networks have advantages such as high precision and strong generalization ability. Therefore, this paper proposes a JRT-NCD (joint response times neural cognitive diagnosis) model that uses neural networks to model the complex nonlinear interactions between exercises and students and incorporates RT as a new feature to refine diagnostic results on student abilities. Research findings on three datasets of PISA2012, 2MFC, and ASSIST09 indicate that: (1) In comparison with traditional statistical models, neural networks have better fitting capabilities for real complex nonlinear data; (2) compared to the NCD model that disregards RT, JRT-NCD achieves higher diagnostic accuracy while maintaining its interpretability, and reduces the misleading effects of "overspeed behavior" on the diagnostic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.