ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: clinical outcomes and practical insights from a single-center experience in Japan.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While transcatheter paravalvular leak (PVL) closure offers a viable alternative to reoperation in high-risk patients, data from Japan remain limited. To address this, we retrospectively analyzed 28 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous PVL closure at a single center in Japan between 2014 and 2022 (mitral, n = 23, aortic, n = 5; median follow-up, 2.0 years). We herein discuss real-time transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with three-dimensional imaging, guided defect characterization, device sizing, and intra-procedural assessment. The study’s primary clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality, and its primary procedural endpoint was technical success, defined as a residual PVL < moderate on intra-procedural TEE in the absence of emergency surgery or death. The secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, or reintervention. Technical success was achieved in 71% of patients. Device strategies evolved over time: in earlier cases, the Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVP II) and Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II) were used off-label, whereas later on, dedicated rectangular PVL devices (PLDs) became the preferred choice, typically requiring fewer devices per case. Hemolysis indices (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase and total bilirubin) improved following successful PVL reduction, and patients with a residual PVL < moderate demonstrated superior clinical outcomes at follow-up. To facilitate benchmarking in elderly and renally impaired populations, we collected practical procedural metrics (procedure duration, contrast volume, and radiation exposure). This single-center experience demonstrates that transcatheter PVL closure is both feasible and effective in Japanese practice, while highlighting the importance of device selection and standardized intra-procedural TEE endpoints for procedural success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.