SynthesisArchives of sexual behavior2026
Problematic Love Behaviors and Correlated Factors: A Systematic Review with Subgroup Meta-Analysis Including Gender/Sex Moderation.
Synthesis in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Problematic love behaviors (PLB) represent a growing concern in relationship research, yet the field lacks a systematic synthesis that clarifies their conceptual and correlational landscape. This study addressed the pronounced conceptual heterogeneity in the literature by reviewing and meta-analytically integrating findings on PLB correlates across distinct conceptual domains. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, sourcing studies from Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Medline. A total of 102 studies met the inclusion criteria and were categorized into three conceptual domains: manic love (ML; n = 55), emotional dependence (ED; n = 34), and love addiction (LA; n = 13). Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were performed, followed by subgroup meta-analyses for correlates supported by at least three studies within each domain. A subsequent moderation analysis by percentage of female participants was conducted to explain residual heterogeneity. Correlates were grouped into three categories: individual psychological, psychosocial, and partner-related factors. The meta-analyses revealed distinct correlational profiles: five significant correlates for ML, eleven for ED, and two for LA. Low self-esteem emerged as a shared correlate of ML and ED, whereas behavioral addictions were shared by ED and LA. The associations between ML and jealousy, as well as between ML and relationship satisfaction, were more pronounced in female-predominant samples. Conversely, the link between LA and anxious attachment was stronger in samples with a higher proportion of men. The systematic differentiation provided by this review has practical implications for establishing more consistent assessment criteria for PLB and advancing the understanding of their predictive factors.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO; identifier: CRD42024513446.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.