ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Quantitative Assessment of Cannula Kinematics in Liposuction Surgical Procedures Using a Marker-Based Tracking System.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim is to develop a reliable, objective, and quantitative system for measuring and analyzing the movement of the cannula tip, which is used in liposuction.
methodsThe customized tracking system was designed using an infrared marker set and stereo vision. It was utilized to accurately track and quantify cannula tip movements during liposuction surgery. The accuracy of this system was validated by comparing its measurements to a commercial motion-tracking system. In addition, a new metric, the normalized cannula movement index (nCMI), was supposed to objectively assess cannula stroke cycles, quantify spatial distribution, and evaluate handling techniques. The developed tracking system exhibited excellent accuracy, with results differing by only approximately 0.9% from the commercial system, confirming its reliability and precision.
resultsThis system enables quantitative comparisons of region-wise stroke distribution and stroke speed across procedures. The proposed nCMI can provide an objective, region-level descriptor of cannula handling patterns that could support comparative assessment. As a result, it can provide consistent and quantitative analysis results. Through quantitative indicators such as stroke cycle and nCMI, it is possible to effectively perform objective evaluations of the liposuction procedures and outcomes.
conclusionConsequently, this study provides a novel tool for objective assessment of surgical techniques. It could contribute to improving surgeon training, predicting postoperative complications, and optimizing the liposuction procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.