ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026
Advances in Pharmacologic- and Non-pharmacologic Interventions for Cancer Pain: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementCancer pain is common, heterogeneous, and multidimensional. The management of cancer pain is evolving toward a personalized, mechanism-informed, and multimodal paradigm. In my practice, systematic pain assessment is performed early, and individualized analgesic therapy is initiated promptly rather than deferred until tumor-directed therapy achieves measurable effects. Opioids remain essential but are limited by toxicity, tolerance, and incomplete control of mixed nociceptive-neuropathic mechanisms. Careful agent selection, dose titration, proactive management of constipation and neurotoxicity, and early consideration of opioid rotation are essential to sustain efficacy and safety. Evidence questions routine acetaminophen add-on to strong opioids and supports individualized risk stratification when using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). For neuropathic and treatment-related pain, gabapentinoids and duloxetine remain key adjuvants. Emerging options, including cannabinoids, novel gabapentinoids (mirogabalin and criligabalin), anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) antibodies, and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1)-targeted therapies (intrathecal resiniferatoxin and high-concentration capsaicin patches), show variable efficacy and require further evaluation before routine use. For refractory pain, neurolytic blocks, intrathecal drug delivery, and neuromodulation may provide meaningful opioid-sparing analgesia in selected patients. These strategies can provide meaningful analgesia and reduce systemic opioid exposure. Nonpharmacologic modalities, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, exercise, acupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, should be incorporated whenever feasible to reduce symptom burden, improve physical function, and support patient coping and overall well-being. This approach ensures that pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies are applied in an integrated, patient-centered manner. Ultimately, optimal cancer pain management requires coordinated multidisciplinary care, shared decision-making, and ongoing reassessment to align analgesic strategies with disease trajectory, patient goals, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.