ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2026
Evolution of gallbladder drainage: a comprehensive review from percutaneous to endoscopic ultrasound-guided approaches.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute cholecystitis frequently occurs in elderly or medically fragile patients. While early cholecystectomy remains the standard treatment for operable patients, gallbladder drainage plays a critical role in those who are poor candidates for immediate surgery. Over the past decade, gallbladder drainage has evolved from reliance on percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) to a spectrum of endoscopic alternatives, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). Although PT-GBD provides rapid and reliable decompression, its use is limited by external catheter-related complications, impaired quality of life, and frequent recurrence when employed as definitive therapy. ET-GBD offers internal physiologic drainage and is particularly useful when transmural access is contraindicated; however, technical success remains highly dependent on cystic duct anatomy and operator experience. In contrast, EUS-GBD, facilitated by lumen-apposing metal stents, has emerged as a transformative technique, consistently achieving high technical and clinical success with fewer reinterventions and superior patient-centered outcomes compared with PT-GBD and ET-GBD in appropriately selected patients. Beyond acute drainage, EUS-GBD enables peroral cholecystoscopy, durable internal drainage, and interval cholecystectomy in selected individuals, although concerns persist regarding long-term stent-related adverse events and the potential impact on subsequent minimally invasive surgery. This review summarizes current evidence, technical considerations, and evolving clinical roles of contemporary gallbladder drainage modalities, emphasizing the need for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making and further high-quality studies to refine long-term management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.