ReviewRheumatology international2026
Pregnancy planning in women with rheumatic diseases: an integrated framework for risk stratification and multidisciplinary management.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatologic diseases and neurologic involvement.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Patient-reported reproductive concerns and care needs among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Reproductive health awareness and family planning practices among women with systemic autoimmune diseases: survey based study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy planning in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) is a multifaceted public health issue that includes complex strategies targeting underlying disease activity and reproductive potential. Patients with autoimmune diseases, including those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SSc), and spondyloarthritis, present with heightened risks of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, including miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and increased utilization of assisted reproductive technologies. Available evidence suggests that conception during sustained disease remission, alongside tailored drug therapies, enhances maternal-fetal outcomes. Critical determinants of obstetric prognosis include disease-specific activity indices, serologic markers, organ involvement, and prior gonadotoxic exposures which compromise ovarian reserve. Structured preconception counseling that integrates contraception strategies, fertility preservation, ovarian reserve assessment, and multidisciplinary follow-up is essential to mitigate these risks. Current management paradigms advocate the continuation of pregnancy-compatible disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), while strictly avoiding teratogenic therapies. Despite these advances, substantial unmet needs exist in early risk stratification, patient education, and systematic integration of reproductive health counselling into routine RD management. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence, delineates existing gaps, and provides a strategic framework for optimizing pregnancy planning and reproductive outcomes in women with RDs. The review addresses the key domains, including preconception risk stratification, disease-specific considerations, fertility assessment, ovarian reserve evaluation, and optimization of drug therapies. A multidisciplinary, treat-to-target approach is essential to improve pregnancy outcomes and long-term maternal health in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.