ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[3D-planning and guided hip and pelvic surgery].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent conditions among all age groups, from toddlers to adults, require surgical procedures at the hip and pelvis. Well-established techniques are complex in planning and execution and currently rely mostly on two-dimensional pre- and intraoperative imaging, resulting in potential imprecision and outcome variability. Inadequate correction carries a considerable risk for recurring symptoms requiring revision surgery. CASE EXAMPLES: In this case series, we present three patient examples using three-dimensional imaging and their application to explore the chances these modalities offer for pre-operative planning and intraoperative referencing and navigation in routine and complex interventions. All three cases showed precise corrections and satisfactory postoperative follow-ups.
conclusionsTo minimize inaccuracies and enable broader use in clinical practice, we therefore recommend further research to develop standardized protocols for the use of these supportive modalities with the aim of reducing the risk of recurrence or early coxarthrosis and thus improving long-term health-related quality of life in the spirit of patient-specific medicine. Due to the lack of specific data to date, the increase in precision and its long-term impact still need to be demonstrated for widespread use in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42029687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.