ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
Pituitary adenoma imaging as a determinant of acromegaly diagnosis and outcomes.
Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the majority (>95%) of patients with acromegaly, the underlying cause is a somatotroph adenoma. Pituitary-targeted surgery and radiotherapy can achieve long-term disease control but carry a significant adverse risk to the remaining normal gland, especially if undertaken outside a Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence or when repeat surgery is performed. Maximizing benefits and minimizing the risks of pituitary surgery and radiotherapy is critically dependent on high-quality imaging that allows accurate localization of site(s) of either de novo, residual, or recurrent disease. Macroadenomas continue to predominate among somatotroph tumors (70%), but more widespread use of intracranial imaging leads to earlier detection of smaller adenomas, posing new challenges for imaging diagnostics. Despite several comprehensive guidelines on the management of acromegaly, there is little consensus regarding optimal imaging, and current scanning protocols remain heterogeneous. This serves as a barrier to optimal patient management and constrains comparison between centers, with inevitable consequences for research within the field. Here, based on a comprehensive review of previous studies and focusing on recent advances in magnetic resonance and molecular (functional) imaging techniques, we propose a standardized, tiered approach to pituitary imaging in patients with acromegaly, guided by individual patient features and tailored to the anticipated therapeutic approach. An online tool, which can be adapted to the clinical context, is provided as an aid to decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.