ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Modulation of Predictive Coding in Auditory Paradigms of Varying Complexity in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modulation of Predictive Coding in Auditory Paradigms of Varying Complexity in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a persistent difficulty in the acquisition and use of expressive and/or receptive language, which negatively impacts academic and social development. The present study evaluated the validity of the statistical learning model proposed to account for language difficulties in children with DLD. To this end, two auditory paradigms of varying complexity, framed within predictive coding theory, were passively presented to children diagnosed with DLD and to typically developing children without neurological impairments. The paradigms consisted of stimulus sequences with decreasing or increasing frequencies, interspersed with the sporadic occurrence of unexpected tone endings. The psychophysiological response was recorded using EEG, focusing on the P1, mismatch negativity (MMN), postimperative negative variation (PINV), and contingent negative variation (CNV) components. Results showed an absent MMN and a higher P1 response to deviant tones in children with DLD, suggesting an impaired development of frontal MMN generators, potentially compensated by activity in the primary auditory cortex. DLD participants also showed increased PINV and CNV responses during the most complex paradigm, which could imply greater cognitive effort and resource allocation for reassessment of stimulus patterns. Finally, incomplete maturation of frontal areas in children within this age range (3-11 years) was proposed as a possible explanation for the absence of differences between groups in P1 and N1/MMN responses elicited by simple and complex conditions. These findings support statistical learning as a valid model for understanding the possible neural basis of DLD and highlight this predictive EEG design as a potential protocol for early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.