Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029571›Full record

ReviewMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Mechanisms and Efficacy of Massage Therapy for Post-Exercise Muscle Repair: A Narrative Review.

Peter M Tiidus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter M TiidusDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although widely used, massage has not been reported to be effective in enhancing recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. Studies using massage-like interventions in animal models have, in contrast, consistently demonstrated a significant enhancement of muscle repair, reduction in muscle inflammation and enhanced return of muscle force following muscle damage. The physiology of muscle damage and repair and the putative physiological mechanisms of potential massage-induced muscle repair and post-damage recovery, including soreness sensation, edema, inflammation, protein synthesis and other related mechanisms, are reviewed in this context. Animal models have demonstrated that massage effectiveness in enhancing post-damage muscle repair is dictated by the timing, duration, force and technique of its application and may also be modified by age and sex effects. The potentially very narrow "window of effectiveness" of massage application for the enhancement of post-damage muscle repair in humans has yet to be defined. And the lack of demonstrated effectiveness for massage on post-damage muscle recovery may be due to the wide range and inconsistency of massage techniques, timing and methodologies applied in human studies. Until a specific massage application protocol is defined for massage efficacy in post-damage human muscle recovery, therapists will continue to work blind, using a variety of techniques which lack empirical validity and have an undemonstrated effectiveness for enhancing muscle repair.

Indexed as

edemainflammationmassagemassage and animal modelsmassage in humansmechanotransductionmuscle force recoverymuscle repairmuscle satellite cellsprotein synthesis

Identifiers

PMID42029571
PMCPMC13108176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.