ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Intraday and Interday Reliability of Maximal and Explosive Handgrip Force-Time Metrics Using the Kinvent K-Grip Handheld Dynamometer.
Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a widely used indicator of neuromuscular function, with predictive values for health and performance outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraday and interday reliability of maximal and explosive handgrip force-time metrics using the Kinvent K-Grip handheld dynamometer. (2) Methods: Thirty-four participants performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions per hand across two testing days. Force-time data were analysed for peak force (PF), mean force (MF), peak rate of force development (RFD), time-specific RFD, impulse, and forces at fixed time points. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and coefficient of variation (CV%). (3) Results: The device demonstrated excellent relative and absolute reliability for PF and MF across both days (ICC > 0.97; CV < 6%; MDC ≈ 5 kg). Later-phase explosive metrics (F250 and Imp200) showed good-to-excellent relative reliability (ICC = 0.88-0.99; CV = 4-14%), although with variable absolute reliability (MDC F250 ≈ 4-8 kg, MDC Imp200 ≈ 1 kg·s). For early-phase metrics, relative reliability was only moderate to good (ICC = 0.67-0.88) and characterised by a high degree of variability (CV = 15-22%). (4) Conclusions: The K-Grip handheld dynamometer is a reliable tool for cross-sectional assessments and for tracking larger maximal strength and later-phase force improvements at fixed time points. Early-phase explosive metrics are less suitable for monitoring intervention effects due to high measurement error and fatigue sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.