ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Parental Views on the Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Results Following Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in England.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parental Views on the Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Results Following Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in England.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The project aimed to explore the psychosocial impact on parents of receiving a false-positive outcome following a positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) result for SCID for their child. A mixed-methods design was employed using semi-structured interviews and standardised health-related questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, ITQOL-47, and GAD-7). The participants were recruited from six National Health Service hospital trusts in England involved in the NHS England In-Service Evaluation of Screening for SCID. A total of 22 interviews were conducted with 28 parents. Health-related questionnaire data were collected from 26 of these parents. The interviews were analysed using a reflexive deductive approach to thematic analysis. For the health-related questionnaire data, a comparison of group means against population norms was undertaken using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.