ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease in Japan.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of a universal newborn screening (NBS) program for infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) compared with clinical identification in newborns. The analytical model combined a decision tree and a Markov model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated over a lifetime horizon, applying a 2% annual discount rate from the public healthcare payer's perspective. In a cohort of 727,288 individuals, 2.4 patients were expected to have IOPD. The cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient were estimated to be 7.9 when clinically diagnosed and treated with enzyme replacement therapy, and 28.9 when identified through universal NBS. The ICER was 174 million JPY per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses indicated that the parameters most affecting the ICER were the NBS test cost, the quality-of-life value for ambulatory patients, the prevalence of IOPD, and the cost of enzyme replacement therapy. Although considerable uncertainty exists in the analysis, the findings suggest that implementing NBS solely for detecting infantile-onset cases poses challenges in terms of cost-effectiveness, primarily due to the rarity of the disease and the high costs associated with testing and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.