Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029537›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026

A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study.

Saskia G Smits, Suzanne M Onstwedder, Tessel Rigter, Wendy Rodenburg, Lidewij Henneman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saskia G SmitsCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-5879-2465
Suzanne M OnstwedderCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-191X
Tessel RigterDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6038-6289
Wendy RodenburgCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Lidewij HennemanDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-0597

Funding

Strategic Program of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment S/1322015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in the genomic sequencing of healthy newborns has raised a discussion on whether this technology should be introduced into existing newborn screening (NBS) programs. This qualitative study explores a multi-stakeholder perspective on the future of genomic sequencing in NBS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 professionals involved in NBS or in clinical genome sequencing in the Netherlands. Participants highlighted opportunities such as the possibility to use one test for a wide range of genetic conditions, reducing diagnostic odyssey, expanding the scope of NBS, and increasing program efficiency. Challenges were raised regarding genetic variant interpretation, expected increased parental anxiety, data privacy issues, difficulties with information provision, and high costs. Three areas of tension between participants' perspectives were identified: screening strategy, screening performance, and roles and responsibilities. It was emphasized that implementing genomic sequencing should not risk reducing the current high NBS participation, and that enhancing knowledge, communication, and collaboration between all stakeholders is needed. Although most participants did not believe genomic sequencing as a first-tier test is currently desirable and feasible, they acknowledged it has a role to play in the future of NBS. Future decision-making should consider the potential impact on the participation rate, program quality, and balancing benefits and harms.

Indexed as

genomic sequencinginterviewsneonatalnewborn screeningstakeholder perspectives

Identifiers

PMID42029537
PMCPMC13108013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.