ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Investigating the Chemical, Antifungal, and Cytotoxic Properties of Cochlospermum vitifolium Leaves and Stem Bark Extracts.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive analysis of the chemical properties and bioactivities of plant extracts is essential for identifying compounds with therapeutic potential. This study analyzed hydroethanolic extracts from the leaves and stem bark of Cochlospermum vitifolium, investigating their chemical composition, antifungal, and cytotoxic activity. UHPLC-MS/MS, GC-MS and bioinformatic tools techniques were employed to characterize the chemical profiles. Antioxidant activities were evaluated using DPPH and ABTS assays, cytotoxicity assessed in L929 fibroblasts and MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells, and antifungal activity was evaluated against Candida spp. The leaf extract exhibited higher total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant capacity in both radical-scavenging, and antifungal activity, reaching a minimum inhibitory concentration of 1.95 µg/mL against Candida albicans. None of the extracts showed cytotoxicity. PCA, chord diagram, and volcano plot indicated clear differences between the chemical profiles of the leaves and stem bark and supported the association between these metabolites and the observed antifungal activity. Finally, in vitro antifungal tests were performed for the first time with C. vitifolium, showing promising results against Candida spp. species, suggesting a safe alternative as an antifungal agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.