SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2026
A systematic review of physical activity guidelines for adults with cardio-respiratory diseases: Stepping towards evidence-based recommendations.
Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesPhysical activity benefits for adults with cardio-respiratory diseases are well established, and evidence-based recommendations are essential for healthcare professionals. This study systematically reviewed existing recommendations on physical activity for adults with cardio-respiratory diseases, specifically chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and heart failure, focusing on the frequency, intensity, time and type (FITT).Data SourcesWe searched OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and grey literature for guidelines and related documents. The comprehensive search was conducted in July 2025 and subsequently updated through March 2026. Two authors independently screened guidelines, extracted FITT components, and documented disease-specific precautions. Disagreements were resolved with a third author. The AGREE II instrument assessed methodological quality for identified CPGs. Recommendations were categorised based on the FITT framework.ResultsWe included 29 guidelines, of which 14 were classified as Clinical Practice Guideline and assessed with AGREE II. Among the 14 guidelines, 7 demonstrated high quality, 6 were moderate, and 1 was low quality. Most guidelines recommended at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity per week. Adaptive recommendations primarily addressed exacerbations and symptom management.ConclusionWhile aerobic physical activity was consistently recommended, disease-specific guidance and adherence to FITT principles were limited. Significant gaps were noted in methodological quality, particularly in stakeholder involvement and applicability. To enhance usability, guidelines should standardise recommendations for type, duration, intensity, and frequency, incorporating evidence grading system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.