ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis Treated With a Novel Technique: The Double-DCB Technique.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention plays an important role in the management of both acute and chronic coronary syndrome. Despite advances in stent technology, in-stent restenosis remains a major Achilles heel in percutaneous coronary intervention and can confer high risk of adverse outcomes for patients. We describe a novel technique (the double-DCB technique) for the treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis by applying 2 different drug-coated balloons, thereby avoiding the implantation of another layer of metal in our patients. More studies are required to understand the long-term outcomes of this technique and compare it with other treatment modalities in a randomized setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.